Commentaries
Combined teach-in will focus on the fight against fundamentalism

Teach-in a response to Sept 11th

By A A

Comments

October 19, 2001

“Women Fight Fundamentalisms: Before and After September 11th” will be the topic of a two-day “teach-in” at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Duke University. The teach-in will build upon the national consensus forged on Sept. 11 against the extremist, militant interpretation of Islam wielded by the terrorist al-Qu’eda organization, Osama bin Laden and Afghanistan’s ruling Taliban. That aberration of Islam is particularly vicious in its treatment of women. The topic of the teach-in is not, however, limited to the fight against that “fundamentalist” version of Islam by women. As the title clearly indicates, the topic is women fighting “fundamentalisms” (plural).

The teach-in’s first speaker will be Gita Sahgal, a member of Women Against Fundamentalism, based in the United Kingdom. Sahgal’s topic will be “Secular Spaces in Women’s Organizing.” Sahgal has also written about the importance of the term “fundamentalism,” which she differentiates from religion, in the Journal of the WAF (no. 5, 1994, pp. 7-9). The founding statement of the WAF holds that fundamentalism refers to “modern political movements which use religion as a basis for their attempts to win or consolidate power and extend social control.” As Sahgal explains, these movements “arise in all major religions,” which includes “white Christian fundamentalists.”

The next speaker will be Mab Segrest, lesbian author and visiting professor of Women’s Studies at Duke. Segrest will discuss “Women, the Rise of the Religious Right, and the New Global Order.” Segrest is a member of North Carolinians Against Racist and Religious Violence, which seeks to counter white-supremacist and neo-Nazi activity in N.C. and whose web site is listed by Google under “U.S. Domestic Terrorism” (meaning NCARR offers information on that subject). The inclusion of “Religious” violence in the organization’s name is no mistake; in a Methodist Women’s magazine Response in 1999 Segrest remarked that “within Christianity, church fiat is the equivalent of [the] pistols” used by the murderers of Matthew Shepard.

Segrest is also on the Board of Directors of Political Research Associates, which states its mission as “monitor[ing] the organizations, individuals, and activities of the US political right” with the purpose of being an “early warning system” of “right-wing activities” and resisting the “right-wing programs.” In its “Fifteen Year Report,” the PRA answers the question “What does ‘right-wing’ mean?” thus: “In the U.S., there is an identifiable right-wing agenda. Its roots lie in the lynchings of Blacks in the South by the Ku Klux Klan, the ideological principles of the John Birch Society, and the McCarthy hearings of the 1950’s. Central to the agenda is white supremacism, preservation of individual wealth in a setting of free market capitalism, preservation of rigidly traditional religious and family structures, and defenses of U.S. military hegemony.”

Segrest praised the PRA, saying “In an era when the right has become so devious and far-flung, the scrupulous and courageous work of Political Research Associates is crucial to shaping progressive strategy.”

The final speaker will be Nawal El Saadawi, an Egyptian feminist who taught at Duke from 1993-96 after having been placed on the death list by Islamic extremists in Egypt. Saadawi will speak on “Religious Fundamentalism, Globalization, and Women.”

In a recent Al-Ahram Weekly Online issue, El Saadawi decries “the Zionist fundamentalist state of Israel, backed by the US [with] an arsenal of modern weapons provided by the US to attack unarmed civilian populations, destroy homes, occupy Palestinians’ land and kill women and children.” She also decries the “racism” of Western critics who link veiling to Islam, saying that veiling is a historical fact of both Judaism and Christianity. “Religious fundamentalism is the same, whether Jewish, Christian, or Islamic,” she writes.

In 1999 El Sadaawi returned to Duke to speak. She declared she was “very critical of the word ‘religion’,” in part because “Almost all wars were done in the name of religion” and also because women are oppressed by all religions. She also compared women’s wearing make-up to wearing a veil.

Among the academic departments and officials sponsoring the teach-in are: at UNC-CH, the Dean of Arts and Sciences, the Women’s Studies Dept., Dept. of Sociology, Dept. of Political Science, and the University Center for International Studies; at Duke, the Vice-Provost of Interdisciplinary Studies, the Women’s Studies Dept., the Vice Provost for International Affairs, Dept. of Religion, Dept. of Asian & African Languages & Literature, and the Center for International Studies. Also sponsoring the teach-in are the North Carolina Center for South Asian Studies, Muslim Networks of Duke, Carolina Seminars for Comparative Islamic Studies of UNC-CH, Carolina Seminars on Bridging the Divide:
Academics, Activists and Social Justice of UNC, Hiwar (Duke Students for Middle East Understanding) and the Progressive Students, Staff and Faculty of UNC-Chapel Hill. Information about the teach-in can be found online at the site for the Progressive Faculty Network of UNC-CH: http://www.unc.edu/depts/pfn/teachins.html.

 


Please observe the Pope Center's commenting policy.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Return to the Commentaries Archive

Copyright © 2016 The John William Pope Center for Higher Education Policy | Site Map

Website design and development by DesignHammer Media Group, LLC. Building Smarter Websites.